Wednesday 8 March 2017

TRIBUTE TO WOMANHOOD




LET ME TAKE SOME TIME OFF INVENTION STORIES AND APPRECIATE OUR WOMEN.

I respect women a lot.

It is a woman that has brought me thus far in my life and career. My mother bore me after carrying me for 9 months and still cares for me.

It was a woman (May her soul rest in peace) that assisted me to enter the higher institution through a Pre-Degree Programme. My sister, a woman wrote to her having known her; then a registrar, I was short-listed for PD programme and I then found my way.

Because of my good behaviour during my SIWES/IT programme, the Chief Engr. (a woman) assisted me to get a Job after my University Education.

Every man should respect and honour his woman, because if the woman wants him dead today, it is certain.

Think about Samson, how Delilah messed up such God’s anointed (a Nazarene). Consider the wisest man; Solomon could not still defeat women, showing us that ‘a thin line separates intelligence from insanity’. 

A woman, Rebecca assisted God in order for the younger son to rule over the senior.

As we heard it rumoured, a woman liberated Nigeria from the tyranny of Abacha.

Two daughters of Lot slept with him while he was drunk and brought about The Amalekites and The Moabites. 

It was a woman (Esther) that vowed ‘if I perish, let it be’ and went unto the King and changed the fate of her condemned people, Israel.

Because of Reuben’s Father’s maiden, Reuben lost his position as first son in the family to Joseph.

Deborah, a prophetess, at one time led Israel to war when the King (a man) was afraid and had great victory.

This to mention only but a few that has come to my knowledge. Hmm, women are synonymous to money. Women can make you and also mar you. Treat them with respect and remember that ‘no matter how sweet a fruit is, if you bite the seed, it is always bitter’. 

As the singer Shaggy would always say ‘the strength of a woman’.  

HAPPY WOMEN'S DAY TO WOMEN THE WORLD OVER!

Sunday 29 January 2017

THE WRIGHT WAY




We often receive letters from young people or their parents asking where the best opportunities for the future lie. Our answer is that special opportunities do not exist in the particular industry or profession-they exist within men themselves. 

On December 17, 1943 the world celebrated the 40th anniversary of the first successful flight of a
self-powered airplane - and I can think of no better time to review some of the highlights in early career of the inventors - the wright brothers. After you have heard the simple story of their lives - I wonder if you will think they were conscious of what Destiny had in store for them?

Wilbur wright was born on a farm near Millville, Indiana - in 1867 - and Orville was born four years later in Dayton, Ohio. Their father was the Reverend Milton Wright. In this period - just after the Civil war - there were yet no electric lights, telephones or automobiles, and their home town, Dayton, a typical American town of about thirty thousand people.
The Wrights were not wealthy people and the boys had no special advantages, except their home environment. Their parents encouraged them to investigate aroused their curiosity, but urged them to try to earn enough to cover the costs of their experiments. The boys tried many things, and to finance their experiments, they sold kites, folded papers and collected junks.  

When bicycles became the fad, the Wright boys each saved up enough money to buy one. This was a new field to them and, after a thorough job of investigation; they went into the bicycle business. Business grew; they not only sold several makes but repaired them, and in 1895 even brought out a custom model of their own make – the Van Cleve

As they read scientific papers, they ran across an article on Lilienthal’s glider experiments in Germany. so they got together all the information they could find about Lilienthal and his work – they investigated Chanute’s experiments – and read about Langley. But the wrights could never be satisfied just reading about these experiments - they had to try things for themselves. They didn’t let the fact that Lilienthal and Pilcher had been killed – or that Chanute had quit after a careful study and many experiments in gliding – prevent them from going ahead. They wanted to fly! 

The Wright boys – in 1899 – began with a biplane kite equipped with wing controls. It is interesting to note their first man-carrying kite cost them, in actual cash outlay, about $15.00. As a result of a letter to Chanute – and Weather Bureau reports – they decided to go to Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, for their first experiments. 

You probably know the story from then on – how they made glider after glider – how they fought the weather – about their accidents – and their inaccurate data. During the next two years, they visited Kitty Hawk with new wings, new controls – and collected fact after fact – until in 1902 they felt they had enough information to build a power machine. Then began another long year’s experiments on engines; they found that there was none in existence that met their requirements. 

On December 17, 1903, after many disappointments and weeks of waiting, they made the world’s first successful flight of a self-powered, heavier-than-air flying machine. Orville was the pilot. The flight lasted 12 seconds. 

These few highlights in the early life of the Wright brothers can give only a sketchy impression of those two American pioneers. Perhaps they weren’t ordinary boys – although there was certainly nothing unusual about their environment. They did not have wealth, family influence or educational advantages. To me they seemed average American boys from an average American town. But they had outstanding qualities – curiosity, persistence, an intense desire to succeed and, above all, they were self-sufficient. They were encouraged to develop themselves from within and not expect too much help from without.

I believe if these young people who write us every year would take the same point of view, they could solve many of their own problems. I don’t believe anyone outside should tell them they should be lawyers, doctors or engineers or advise them what business to get into. Suppose someone had insisted that the Wright boys get into the new automobile business – the development of the airplane might have been delayed for decades. Certainly no one, at that time, could have advised them to investigate the airplane business – there simply wasn’t any.

A young man starting out today should analyse his own problems, prepare himself, perfect his thinking – and be ready and willing to face the inevitable failures and discouragements. I would not depend too much on a fairy god-mother pointing out the Road to success. I would be more inclined to do some surveying and map making of my own.

RESEARCH IS A STATE OF MIND




Every time l have the good fortune of being in the studio audience, l am impressed with the fact that it takes much less energy to listen to music than to direct or play it. 
So, while the Maestro and the Orchestra rest for a moment, i will tell you of a simple comparison between Music and Research that we have used many times. 

This evening, we are listening to the compositions of Mozart. He was one of those rare and talented individuals who had the natural gifts of both composition and execution. He was a child prodigy. This type of individual is rare but each generation may produce one or more - they occur not only in the musical field but also in art, medicine and science, and their contributions are of great importance. Most of our work, however, must be done by people with just ordinary abilities in the beginning who reach positions of skill or responsibility by practice, study and plain persistence. 

Now, i don't know the individual histories of men in the his Orchestra but I suspect the majority of them are here as a result of arduous practice and much hard work, and in many cases, sacrifices of many kinds. This symphony Orchestra is a body of men, who, in order to perform superbly as a group, must first be able to perform equally well as individuals. Just organizing a group of poor musicians doesn't make a good Orchestra. 

Research is done in much the same way. Our work can either be the effort of a group or of individual specialists. In fact, just like a good Orchestra, each man must be a skilled and talented individual. There is one outstanding difference, when we compare Orchestra with research - research has no Mozart score to follow - we are working with unwritten scores. The procedure must be different in nearly every case. It is more like composition and performance at the same time. 

For many years there has been much misunderstanding as to just what research is. The popular conception seems to be that there is something mysterious about it, and before any research can be done, it is necessary to have expensive scientific apparatus and large ; elaborately equipped buildings. Actually, this is not so. Research isn't a physical thing at all but just a state of mind. It is a simple organised way of trying to accomplish something you wish to do-so simple that anyone can do research anywhere at any time. 

First, you select the problem you would like to solve, and then you list at least ten reasons why this has not been solved. But in picking that problem be sure to analyse it carefully to see that it is worth the effort. It takes as much effort to solve a useless problem as a useful one. Make sure the game is worth the candle. 

After carefully selecting the problem and the ten things between you and the solution, you then use the same procedure as in solving a cross-word puzzle. 
You take the easy obstacles first and by a process of elimination you arrived at last at the one or two major ones. In the solution of the remaining obstacles you may need some simple apparatus, but the things you will probably need most are infinite patience and persistence. Few people realise the difficulties of doing any new thing. 

Maybe one of the reasons people are so early discouraged is because of their education. During all of our years at school we were examined two or three times a year. If we failed once we are out. In Contrast, all research work is 99.9 percent failure and if you success once you are in. If we are going to process in any line we must learn to fail intelligently, so we won't become discouraged at the 99.9 percent failure. 

EXPLOSIVE IDEA




As no one can predict who will make an invention or how it will be used, we should not be surprised when we learn that 780 years ago an English monk carefully wrote this down, “I have produced an explosion that out-roared thunder and with a flash that exceeded the brilliance of lightning”. Roger Bacon hid this formula in a Latin cryptogram which said, “Take seven parts of saltpeter, five of charcoal and five of sulphur”. When he wrote down these dozen words, Bacon probably had no idea that they might later influence the whole of civilization because, as you know, he was describing gunpowder, the first of the great family of explosives. 

He may have had some conception after all of the possibilities of the mixture because he was a remarkable, farseeing man who not only experimented with chemical combinations but also predicted the use of the steamship, the automobile and the airplane, and described in detail the magnifying or reading glass. 

Roger Bacon lived near the end of the dark ages – the days of the alchemists and the Black Arts. But even in those days of superstition, he was a strong advocate of the fundamentals of modern research. He stated it this way, “Take nothing for granted – use your own eyes and test all new theories with your own hands”. Roger bacon by his work in philosophy laid the foundation for modern scientific research. 

He wrote once that his gunpowder mixture might completely blow up an opposing army or put it to flight by the terror of the explosion; however, he made no mention of using it in firearms. 

It wasn’t until after his death that the cannon was first mentioned. There is an Arabic account of a cannon in 1303 and in Oxford, England, a picture dated 1326 shows what was called a “dart-throwing vase”. Edward  used wooden canon and a weapon consisting of 144 barrels in groups of 12 – an idea not unlike our battery banks of today.       
   
When Mohammed 11 besieged Constantinople in 1453, he had 13 large guns called bombards and 56 small cannon. The bombards were immense – requiring 60 oxen to pull them in place. They threw stones 30 inches in diameter which weighed three quarters of a ton. But since it took 2 hours to load them, they could fire only a few times each day. However, the new weapon was effective and Mohammed’s army battered its way into the city in less than two months and ended the Roman Empire in the East. 

The invention of gunpowder and the subsequent development of the cannon and musket emphasize the importance of Roger Bacon’s work as a bridge between the Dark ages and the beginning of the new scientific era. He knew his methods of careful experimentation were at odds with the superstition and guess-work of his time because he was often thrown into jail. He realised that his theories and experiments belonged more to the future than to his own time. 

Yet it is hardly possible that he could have foreseen the great commercial and industrial applications of his ideas, for just as the steam engine and the internal combustion engine were used first in industry and then became important factors in the conduct of war, so gunpowder, developed and first used in war, made an even greater contribution to industry in such places as mines, quarries, clearing of new lands, digging irrigation ditches and in many other applications. In fact, the development of explosives from the work of Roger Bacon has been taken by some to the beginning of the age of industrial chemistry. 

The peacetime use of explosives has been so great that the production of military needs were met with no unusual difficulty. The millions of shells from thousands of guns and the bombs used by our airplanes on all the battlefronts are the evidences of just a part of what came from the idea born seven centuries ago. No one can sit in judgment of any new born idea and say what its future uses may be.